I
recently read THE KINGS OF COOL, re-read SAVAGES, and watched the movie
adaptation. Below are my thoughts on the Ben, Chon, and O threesome, starting
with the prequel, THE KINGS OF COOL.
This one has a bit of everything in
it. From O’s love and hero-worship of Chon, drug wars, shady cops, to family
drama and close encounters with death. The exploration of the Southern
California drug trade through the 60’s to early 2000’s paints a culture of
violence handed down by generation starting from some unlikely sources. Ben
emerges as a serious player despite an adversity to violence, while on the other
hand, Chon rules the streets with an iron first – but what happens when that
fists lands square in the face of someone he least expected?
The dialogue is witty and humorous,
reminiscent of Elmore Leonard at his best. It’s instantly readable and at once
addictive. Fans of Winslow will appreciate the flashback sequences where
characters Frankie Machine and Bobby Z make cameo appearances. THE KINGS OF COOL
goes a long way to establishing interconnectivity with other Winslow titles –
now to go back and re-read them all, first up SAVAGES (earlier review below).
And so starts a non stop thrill ride
of drugs, sex, violence, and big business cartel warfare.
When I first read SAVAGES, I was
blown away by how engaging the characters were and the second time round is no
different. O is unique, funny, and deeply in love with her boys, both
of whom freely share her heart and bed. She's the innocent victim of the
Baja Cartels greed and thirst for expansion.
Ben and Chon, now having read THE
KINGS OF COOL are that much cooler - if possible. Winslow is really onto a
winner with this semi odd couple - one a violent and take charge through
violence, the other, a negotiator with a Zen-like outlook on
life.
As for the story,
Winslow doesn't miss a beat. There's enough back-story to make the
characters feel real while the action clocks breakneck speed. I love the
approach Ben and Chon take to raise enough money to meet the cartels
requirements. It's a blood romp through California sun, shine and drug
warfare.
My original
take was much less comprehensive but remains true: Great characters, fast moving
story and non stop action. The Bruen-like prose was well executed - Winslow has
adopted this style and made it his own. (Jan 2011)
Ben and Chon though were cast well
and executed nearly 100%. I didn't find them deviating from novel al that much -
these two were the most pleasing aspect of the move.
Lado is
a bad man in the book and is equally if not more so in movie - there are some
added touches that really highlight how dangerous and unpredictable this
character is, notably his treatment of the kidnapped O. That said, a key element
was missing from book with Lado's wife written as a little more
than a bit player - there is one scene in the book which
seals Lado's fate - this was missing in the movie as the
screenplay took a slightly different path.
Don Winslow's SAVAGES is a
quick, precise and constantly moving and evolving story. The movie, while
keeping true to these theme was a lot longer in duration than I had anticipated.
Fast readers could realistically read the book completely in less time
than it would take to watch the movie from beginning to end.
Overall I was satisfied with the
adaptation but had hoped for a little more. I think if O was given a
deeper backstory and had her trademark humour and care free
attitude brought to the forefront then SAVAGES would've been something special.
I will re-watch this (as I bought the BluRay) but wont be going back to it as often as the
book. For me, the movie gets a 6.5 out of 10.
Liked Savages, hated the movie, will have to read the prequel
ReplyDelete