From the back of the book:
All of these women are notorious, but are all of them deadly? Child murder: A social taboo and one of the most abhorrent acts most of us can imagine. Meet the women found guilty of murdering their own children. They represent some of the most hated women in Australia. The infamous list includes psychologically damaged, sometimes deranged, women on the edge. But, as we will see, accused doesn't always mean guilty. Among the cases covered is that of Kathleen Folbigg, accused and found guilty of killing four of her children, even with a lack of any forensic evidence proving her guilt; Rachel Pfitzner, who strangled her 2-year-old son and dumped his body in a duck pond; as well as Keli Lane, found guilty of child murder though no body has ever been found.Dr Mallett goes back to the beginning of each case; death's ground zero. That might be the accused's childhood, were they abused? Or was their motivation greed, or fear of losing a partner? Were they just simply evil? Or did the media paint them as such, against the evidence and leading to a travesty of justice.Each case will be re-opened, the alternative suspects assessed, the possible motives reviewed. Informed by her background as a forensic scientist, Xanthe offers insight into aspects of the cases that may not have been explored previously. Taking you on her journey through the facts, and reaching her own conclusion as to whether she believe the evidence points to the women's guilt. Hear their stories.
My Review:
Many readers would hold a macabre curiosity attached to the
topical nature of this book if not a passing interest by virtue of the
unspeakable act implicit in the title. The very thought of a maternal parent
undertaking such a heinous crime in murdering their child is incomprehensible
to many (myself included) yet, there are a sinister few who have done this. Dr Xanthe
Mallett looks at a number of infamous cases and provides an objective
interpretation and overview of the particulars that led to the unfortunate
course of events while also examining the core police investigation, witness
accounts, forensic evidence, and passing her theory on the presumption of
innocence or justifiable conviction.
MOTHERS WHO MURDER is a hard book to put down; the writing
style and chapter layout make it instantly readable and easily consumable in a
few sittings. Dr Mallett’s use of layman’s terms integrated within the
narrative make this more of a read for casual true crime enthusiasts as opposed
to a text book laden with jargon - instantly appealing to a broader audience of
reader.
Familiarity with the cases isn’t a prerequisite to comprehend
what Dr Mallett is further elaborating on as each chapter detailing a case provides
sufficient background and extensive reference points for further reading.
Do I feel any different about some of the cases depicted in
MOTHERS WHO MURDER in comparison to what I knew of these crimes prior to
reading? Yes. It’s an answer that shocks me but one that I imagine, Dr Mallett
had intended throughout the course of writing the book. Presenting detailed
factual evidence forensically examined and subsequently explained in layman’s
terms allows the reader to make their own judgement without prejudice.
Dr Mallett at the end of the book favourably leans towards
writing more – given how MOTHERS WHO MURDER turned out; I hope this eventuates in
more true crime books in the future.
